首页> 外文OA文献 >Secondary Low Volume Rural Road Safety: Segmentation, Crash Prediction, and Identification of High Crash Locations
【2h】

Secondary Low Volume Rural Road Safety: Segmentation, Crash Prediction, and Identification of High Crash Locations

机译:次要的低容量农村道路安全:细分,碰撞预测和高碰撞地点的识别

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Traffic safety research is important to understand the interactions and relationships between crashes and the roadway. Methods have been established for segmenting roadways for safety analysis, creating safety performance functions, and identifying high crash locations. However, little work or reasoning is available to provide guidance for segmenting and modeling secondary low volume rural roads (LVRRs). This study investigated the effect of secondary LVRR segment length on segment analysis. Safety performance models were also examined and created for secondary LVRRs. Using previously proposed tests, four different high crash identification methods (crash frequency, crash rate, empirical Bayes and crash reduction potential) were compared for use on secondary LVRRs in Iowa. Analysis of the secondary LVRR system identifies a trend showing as segment length increases, so does the statistical reliability of the average annual crash frequency as compared to the variance in crash frequencies from year to year. Serious and total crash prediction models are recommended for use on four different classes of mainline secondary LVRRs: paved and unpaved 1-99 AADT, and paved and unpaved 100-400 AADT. Lastly, empirical Bayes is recommended as the best available method for identifying high crash locations on secondary LVRRs in Iowa. Care is advised when developing candidate high crash location lists for secondary LVRRs based on segmented systems where systemic treatment may be more appropriate.
机译:交通安全研究对于理解事故与道路之间的相互作用和关系非常重要。已经建立了用于对道路进行分段以进行安全分析,创建安全性能功能以及识别高车祸位置的方法。但是,很少有工作或推理可为细分和建模次要低流量农村公路(LVRR)提供指导。这项研究调查了次级LVRR段长度对段分析的影响。还针对次要LVRR检查并创建了安全绩效模型。使用先前提出的测试,比较了四种不同的高碰撞识别方法(碰撞频率,碰撞率,经验贝叶斯和碰撞减少潜力),用于爱荷华州的次要LVRR。对次要LVRR系统的分析确定了一个趋势,该趋势显示随着段长度的增加,与每年逐​​年崩溃频率的变化相比,年均崩溃频率的统计可靠性也是如此。建议将严重和完全崩溃预测模型用于四种不同类别的主线次要LVRR:已铺设和未铺设的1-99 AADT,以及已铺设和未铺设的100-400 AADT。最后,建议将经验贝叶斯作为确定爱荷华州次要LVRR上高碰撞位置的最佳可用方法。在根据可能更适合全身治疗的分段系统制定次要LVRR的高碰撞位置候选列表时,应格外小心。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cook, Daniel Joseph;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号